<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XM SkyDock: Already a winner for Sirius XM Radio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siriusxmnews.com/2009/10/xm-skydock-already-a-winner-for-sirius-xm-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siriusxmnews.com/2009/10/xm-skydock-already-a-winner-for-sirius-xm-radio/</link>
	<description>Visit Musicsink.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://siriusxmnews.com/2009/10/xm-skydock-already-a-winner-for-sirius-xm-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siriusxmnews.com/?p=890#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this skydock is not a bad idea.But I might want to caution you that a lot of the channels especatailly the decades channels still have a small FM style playlists with lots of repeats With the exceptions of the 50&#039;s 5 and the 60&#039;s 6 have improved a little As well as the Strobe.The 80&#039;s on 8 is still the worst of the decades channels with less than 500 songs in rotation.Not to mention other channels such as the Blend and love have small playlists as well.I guess mel decided to shelve this supposedly new channel lineup indefinately.Refering what you reported on back in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this skydock is not a bad idea.But I might want to caution you that a lot of the channels especatailly the decades channels still have a small FM style playlists with lots of repeats With the exceptions of the 50&#8242;s 5 and the 60&#8242;s 6 have improved a little As well as the Strobe.The 80&#8242;s on 8 is still the worst of the decades channels with less than 500 songs in rotation.Not to mention other channels such as the Blend and love have small playlists as well.I guess mel decided to shelve this supposedly new channel lineup indefinately.Refering what you reported on back in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://siriusxmnews.com/2009/10/xm-skydock-already-a-winner-for-sirius-xm-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siriusxmnews.com/?p=890#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this skydock is not a bad idea.But I might want to caution you that a lot of the channels especatailly the decades channels still have a small FM style playlists with lots of repeats With the exceptions of the 50&#039;s 5 and the 60&#039;s 6 have improved a little As well as the Strobe.The 80&#039;s on 8 is still the worst of the decades channels with less than 500 songs in rotation.Not to mention other channels such as the Blend and love have small playlists as well.I guess mel decided to shelve this supposedly new channel lineup indefinately.Refering what you reported on back in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this skydock is not a bad idea.But I might want to caution you that a lot of the channels especatailly the decades channels still have a small FM style playlists with lots of repeats With the exceptions of the 50&#8242;s 5 and the 60&#8242;s 6 have improved a little As well as the Strobe.The 80&#8242;s on 8 is still the worst of the decades channels with less than 500 songs in rotation.Not to mention other channels such as the Blend and love have small playlists as well.I guess mel decided to shelve this supposedly new channel lineup indefinately.Refering what you reported on back in July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

